Triple
T21902859
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lopik |
E540853
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesDialingCodeFormat |
P143537
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dutch telephone numbering plan |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dutch telephone numbering plan | Statement: [Lopik, usesDialingCodeFormat, Dutch telephone numbering plan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesDialingCodeFormat Context triple: [Lopik, usesDialingCodeFormat, Dutch telephone numbering plan]
-
A.
countryCodeFormat
Indicates the standardized structure or pattern in which a country's code must be represented.
-
B.
telephoneDialingCodeSystem
chosen
Indicates the telephone numbering or dialing code scheme used to place calls within or to a particular region, network, or service.
-
C.
internationalFormat
Indicates that a value is expressed using a standardized international representation or notation, rather than a local or regional format.
-
D.
hasIslandDialingCode
Indicates that an island is associated with a particular telephone dialing code used for placing calls to it.
-
E.
callingCodeType
Indicates the type or category of a telephone calling code associated with an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c47b4e8c81908c8076eaa4c8e4f2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f121d3c23081908c30c3a617002389 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6be9ebf4c8190892df1a8e1313f88 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:24 p.m.