Triple
T21894274
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | al-Hakam I |
E540634
|
entity |
| Predicate | father |
P120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hisham I |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hisham I | Statement: [al-Hakam I, father, Hisham I]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hisham I Context triple: [al-Hakam I, father, Hisham I]
-
A.
Hisham I
chosen
Hisham I was an 8th-century Umayyad emir of Córdoba known for consolidating Islamic rule in al-Andalus and promoting religious and legal scholarship.
-
B.
Hisham II
Hisham II was a 10th–11th century Umayyad caliph of Córdoba whose troubled reign marked the beginning of the decline of the Caliphate of al-Andalus.
-
C.
Hisham III
Hisham III was the final Umayyad ruler of the Caliphate of Córdoba, presiding over its decline and eventual collapse in the early 11th century.
-
D.
Hisham ibn al-Hakam
Hisham ibn al-Hakam was an early and influential Shi'a theologian and debater known for his rational defense of Imamate and his close association with the circles of the early Imams.
-
E.
Muayyad al-Dawla
Muayyad al-Dawla was a Buyid dynasty ruler who governed parts of western Iran in the 10th century during the height of Buyid power.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c47a95908190ae3e19b716accb3d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f11fc539708190a42f202e7404a213 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:07 p.m.