Triple

T21885212
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hydra E540386 entity
Predicate hasIAUBoundaries P36415 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Hydra, hasIAUBoundaries, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIAUBoundaries
Context triple: [Hydra, hasIAUBoundaries, yes]
  • A. hasIAUBoundariesDefinedBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s boundaries are defined or delimited according to standards or specifications established by the International Astronomical Union (IAU).
  • B. hasDefinedBoundaries
    Indicates that the entity possesses clearly established and recognized limits or borders that distinguish it from its surroundings or from other entities.
  • C. hasBoundaryUnit
    Indicates that one entity uses or is associated with a specific unit of measurement for its boundary or limit.
  • D. hasBoundaryFeature
    Indicates that a boundary (such as an edge, border, or limit) of one entity is characterized, marked, or defined by a specific feature or element.
  • E. hasBoundarySystem
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific boundary system that defines its limits or separation from its surroundings.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c479a98081908ce333853fdd4348 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f118eabb008190ab6f1364ef4e6feb completed April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be9a65888190a66598d62d20366c completed April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:05 p.m.