Triple
T21876000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Guilty |
E540144
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableSingle |
P3283
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Guilty (song) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Guilty (song) | Statement: [Guilty, notableSingle, Guilty (song)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Guilty (song) Context triple: [Guilty, notableSingle, Guilty (song)]
-
A.
Guilty
chosen
"Guilty" is a synth-pop/new wave song by Classix Nouveaux that became one of their best-known tracks in the early 1980s.
-
B.
Guilty
Guilty is a 1980 collaborative studio album by Barbra Streisand and Barry Gibb that blends pop and adult contemporary styles and became one of Streisand’s most commercially successful releases.
-
C.
Guilty
"Guilty" is a popular rock song by Finnish band The Rasmus, known for its catchy melody and emotional lyrics.
-
D.
Guilty
Guilty is a philosophical and autobiographical work by Georges Bataille that explores themes of inner experience, transgression, and existential crisis through a fragmented diary-like form.
-
E.
"Guilty"
"Guilty" is a pop song written and produced by British songwriter Ben Findon, best known from its hit recordings in the late 1970s.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c479a98081908ce333853fdd4348 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f0f33a4e608190bd25bfa3fb5cac10 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:02 p.m.