Triple
T21874994
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shotti |
E540113
|
entity |
| Predicate | trialContext |
P31966
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. Kifano Jordan et al. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Kifano Jordan et al. | Statement: [Shotti, trialContext, United States v. Kifano Jordan et al.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Kifano Jordan et al. Context triple: [Shotti, trialContext, United States v. Kifano Jordan et al.]
-
A.
United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al.
United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg Military Tribunal case prosecuting SS officials for racial policies, including kidnapping, Germanization, and persecution in occupied Eastern Europe.
-
B.
United States v. Giordano
United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
-
C.
United States v. Klein
United States v. Klein is an 1871 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s power to control federal court jurisdiction in a way that dictates judicial outcomes, reinforcing the separation of powers.
-
D.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
E.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Kifano Jordan et al. Target entity description: United States v. Kifano Jordan et al. is the federal criminal case in which rapper Tekashi 6ix9ine’s former manager Kifano “Shotti” Jordan and other Nine Trey Gangsta Bloods members were prosecuted on racketeering and related charges.
-
A.
United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al.
United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg Military Tribunal case prosecuting SS officials for racial policies, including kidnapping, Germanization, and persecution in occupied Eastern Europe.
-
B.
United States v. Giordano
United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
-
C.
United States v. Klein
United States v. Klein is an 1871 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s power to control federal court jurisdiction in a way that dictates judicial outcomes, reinforcing the separation of powers.
-
D.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
E.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c478f59081909d54302b57fc1ce3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f0f33957f481908789b054a4fd1b77 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:02 p.m.