Triple
T21871850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brother of Mine |
E540020
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTimeSignatureChanges |
P83232
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Brother of Mine, hasTimeSignatureChanges, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTimeSignatureChanges Context triple: [Brother of Mine, hasTimeSignatureChanges, yes]
-
A.
hasTimeSignatureChange
chosen
Indicates that the time signature changes at some point within the duration of the referenced musical segment or piece.
-
B.
hasTimeSignature
Indicates that a musical work, passage, or segment is associated with a specific time signature defining its rhythmic meter.
-
C.
hasTempoChanges
Indicates that the tempo of the piece or segment changes over its duration, rather than remaining constant.
-
D.
timeSignatureChange
Indicates a change from one musical time signature to another within a piece or passage.
-
E.
hasTimeSignatureComplexity
Indicates that one musical work, passage, or pattern is characterized by a specified level or type of complexity in its time signature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c478f59081909d54302b57fc1ce3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f0f3368d488190a37224b587858ab0 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6be9394f88190945ddd1dc004d29d |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:58 p.m.