Triple
T21841729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | That '70s Song |
E539268
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdditionalLyrics |
P145527
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [That '70s Song, hasAdditionalLyrics, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdditionalLyrics Context triple: [That '70s Song, hasAdditionalLyrics, true]
-
A.
hasAdditionalLyricsBy
Indicates that an entity (such as a musical work or track) includes extra or modified lyrics contributed by a specified person or group beyond the original lyricist.
-
B.
hasLyric
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
-
C.
hasLyricsFeature
Indicates that something possesses a particular characteristic or attribute related to its lyrics.
-
D.
hasLyricsIn
Indicates that the lyrics of a work are written or available in a specified language.
-
E.
hasExplicitLyrics
Indicates that the referenced content contains explicit language or themes, such as profanity, sexual content, or strong violence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c476c3c88190a92d08ebb59a128a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f0a7acb17c81908c0de0afac5a9fa7 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6be8c14748190bdcc44a14d50bea4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6c187bc548190b4ca13150f6bae38 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:55 p.m.