Triple
T21839780
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kehama |
E539222
|
entity |
| Predicate | governs |
P760
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hindoo kingdom (fictional) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hindoo kingdom (fictional) | Statement: [Kehama, governs, Hindoo kingdom (fictional)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hindoo kingdom (fictional) Context triple: [Kehama, governs, Hindoo kingdom (fictional)]
-
A.
Gond kingdoms of central India
The Gond kingdoms of central India were a group of powerful medieval and early modern tribal states ruled by Gond dynasties across the forested heartland of central India, known for their distinctive culture, fortresses, and regional influence before the rise of Maratha and British power.
-
B.
Paurava kingdom
The Paurava kingdom was an ancient Indian realm in the Punjab region, ruled by King Porus and noted for its fierce resistance against Alexander the Great during his invasion of the Indian subcontinent.
-
C.
Rohilla Kingdom
The Rohilla Kingdom was an 18th-century Afghan-ruled state in northern India, centered in the Rohilkhand region, known for its military power and frequent conflicts with neighboring powers such as the Marathas and the Nawabs of Awadh.
-
D.
Kishkindha kingdom
Kishkindha kingdom is the legendary monkey realm ruled by Sugriva in the Indian epic Ramayana, known as the place where Lord Rama formed an alliance to search for Sita.
-
E.
kingdom of Nishadha
The kingdom of Nishadha is a legendary realm in Hindu mythology, best known as the domain of King Nala and his wife Damayanti in the Mahabharata.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hindoo kingdom (fictional) Target entity description: Hindoo kingdom (fictional) is an imagined Indian realm ruled by the powerful figure Kehama in Robert Southey’s epic poem "The Curse of Kehama."
-
A.
Gond kingdoms of central India
The Gond kingdoms of central India were a group of powerful medieval and early modern tribal states ruled by Gond dynasties across the forested heartland of central India, known for their distinctive culture, fortresses, and regional influence before the rise of Maratha and British power.
-
B.
Paurava kingdom
The Paurava kingdom was an ancient Indian realm in the Punjab region, ruled by King Porus and noted for its fierce resistance against Alexander the Great during his invasion of the Indian subcontinent.
-
C.
Rohilla Kingdom
The Rohilla Kingdom was an 18th-century Afghan-ruled state in northern India, centered in the Rohilkhand region, known for its military power and frequent conflicts with neighboring powers such as the Marathas and the Nawabs of Awadh.
-
D.
Kishkindha kingdom
Kishkindha kingdom is the legendary monkey realm ruled by Sugriva in the Indian epic Ramayana, known as the place where Lord Rama formed an alliance to search for Sita.
-
E.
kingdom of Nishadha
The kingdom of Nishadha is a legendary realm in Hindu mythology, best known as the domain of King Nala and his wife Damayanti in the Mahabharata.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c476c3c88190a92d08ebb59a128a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f0a7aaa4f081909e869d2e81b07b91 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:55 p.m.