Triple
T21831068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anne Beauchamp, 16th Countess of Warwick |
E538994
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfInheritance |
P51075
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contested |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contested | Statement: [Anne Beauchamp, 16th Countess of Warwick, legalStatusOfInheritance, contested]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfInheritance Context triple: [Anne Beauchamp, 16th Countess of Warwick, legalStatusOfInheritance, contested]
-
A.
successionLawStatus
Indicates the legal status or condition governing how succession or inheritance is determined or applied.
-
B.
inheritanceStatus
chosen
Indicates the type or condition of inheritance rights or succession status that applies between related parties.
-
C.
legalSuccession
Indicates that one entity lawfully assumes the rights, obligations, or position previously held by another entity, typically through inheritance, transfer, or statutory succession.
-
D.
legalStatusOfClaims
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of specific claims within a legal or administrative context.
-
E.
legalCodeStatus
Indicates the legal or regulatory status assigned to a specific code within a legal or statutory system (e.g., active, repealed, pending).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c475cda88190987d08f23caebdc1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f091362d9081909f00ad7a2806d5cb |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6be8c14748190bdcc44a14d50bea4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:55 p.m.