Triple

T21816779
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Espíritu Pampa E538623 entity
Predicate hasMaterialEvidenceOf P70490 FINISHED
Object Inca urban planning LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Inca urban planning | Statement: [Espíritu Pampa, hasMaterialEvidenceOf, Inca urban planning]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMaterialEvidenceOf
Context triple: [Espíritu Pampa, hasMaterialEvidenceOf, Inca urban planning]
  • A. hasMaterialEvidence chosen
    Indicates that there exists tangible, physical evidence supporting or associated with a particular entity, event, or claim.
  • B. hasProcessEvidence
    Indicates that there is supporting evidence for a process or procedure associated with the subject in relation to the object.
  • C. hasEvidenceItem
    Indicates that there exists a specific piece of evidence supporting, illustrating, or justifying the associated entity or claim.
  • D. hasNoEvidenceOf
    Indicates that there is no supporting proof, data, or documentation confirming the existence or occurrence of the referenced condition, event, or relationship.
  • E. providesEvidenceFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c475038c8190abb9b1a20eb8ff50 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f07ccac9f08190b835ee7a40ecf4c2 completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be815a108190be81d7c987d0c0d6 completed April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:54 p.m.