Triple
T21816308
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Out of Touch |
E538613
|
entity |
| Predicate | 12inchRemixLength |
P145775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 6:33 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 6:33 | Statement: [Out of Touch, 12inchRemixLength, 6:33]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 12inchRemixLength Context triple: [Out of Touch, 12inchRemixLength, 6:33]
-
A.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
B.
hasRemixed
Indicates that one entity has created a new version or adaptation of another entity by remixing it.
-
C.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
-
D.
isRemixWith
Indicates that one creative work is a remix created in collaboration with, or incorporating elements from, another specific work.
-
E.
mixtape
Indicates that one entity has created or compiled a curated collection of audio tracks, typically recorded or assembled together as a single compilation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c473f0f8819086c9d1b4a143bd67 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f07ccac9f08190b835ee7a40ecf4c2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6be815a108190be81d7c987d0c0d6 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6c670ee608190b9cfdc09de74f0de |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:54 p.m.