Triple

T21798125
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jabari E538155 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithMeadow P10690 FINISHED
Object romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationship | Statement: [Jabari, relationshipTypeWithMeadow, romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithMeadow
Context triple: [Jabari, relationshipTypeWithMeadow, romantic relationship]
  • A. associationWithHumans
    Indicates a general relationship, connection, or involvement between an entity and one or more humans.
  • B. hasAgriculturalAssociation
    Indicates that there exists a formal or recognized connection between an entity and an agricultural organization, group, or activity.
  • C. relationshipType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
  • D. servesAsFarmSystemFor
    Indicates that one entity functions as a developmental or feeder system that supplies trained or prepared resources (such as players, talent, or products) to another entity.
  • E. identityRelation
    Indicates that two entities are in fact the very same entity, not merely similar or equivalent.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c4733f4081909a86622e7e6d15d2 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f077fb87848190b6df9a9d1c5336af completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be751ce881909badced245ef76c7 completed April 21, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:53 p.m.