Triple

T21787843
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Henry Molaison E537886 entity
Predicate memoryDeficit P145640 FINISHED
Object inability to form new long-term episodic memories LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inability to form new long-term episodic memories | Statement: [Henry Molaison, memoryDeficit, inability to form new long-term episodic memories]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: memoryDeficit
Context triple: [Henry Molaison, memoryDeficit, inability to form new long-term episodic memories]
  • A. memory
    Indicates that an entity retains, recalls, or is associated with stored information or past experiences.
  • B. память
    Indicates a relationship where an entity retains, recalls, or is associated with stored information, experiences, or data.
  • C. forgets
    Indicates that an entity fails to remember or loses awareness of something that was previously known or intended.
  • D. hasMemoryBlackouts
    Indicates that an entity experiences episodes of lost or impaired memory for certain periods or events.
  • E. memoryState
    Indicates the condition or configuration of an entity’s stored information at a particular point in time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c47198f881908cb0d237266c10e9 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f0621c68588190977891055e80a499 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be751ce881909badced245ef76c7 completed April 21, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e6c3a2898881909748935cf92f898c completed April 21, 2026, 12:24 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:52 p.m.