Triple

T21783585
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Artin reciprocity law E537778 entity
Predicate assertsExistenceOf P42357 FINISHED
Object canonical surjective homomorphism from the idele class group to the abelianized Galois group LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canonical surjective homomorphism from the idele class group to the abelianized Galois group | Statement: [Artin reciprocity law, assertsExistenceOf, canonical surjective homomorphism from the idele class group to the abelianized Galois group]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assertsExistenceOf
Context triple: [Artin reciprocity law, assertsExistenceOf, canonical surjective homomorphism from the idele class group to the abelianized Galois group]
  • A. assertsNonexistenceOf
    Indicates that one entity explicitly claims or states that another entity does not exist.
  • B. assertedIn
    Indicates that a statement, claim, or relation is explicitly made or declared within a particular source, context, or document.
  • C. existsFor
    Indicates that something is present, available, or holds true for a particular entity, context, or condition.
  • D. existsAs
    Indicates that one entity has the same identity or manifestation as another, effectively asserting they are the same existing thing or state.
  • E. concludesExistenceOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity determines or infers that another entity exists.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c47198f881908cb0d237266c10e9 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f046303d54819096b3fab4ab5678e6 completed April 28, 2026, 5:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be6299988190a34c98fa76d94700 completed April 21, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:52 p.m.