Triple

T21769801
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject EAMU E537392 entity
Predicate legalFrameworkStatus P145888 FINISHED
Object implementation and negotiation ongoing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: implementation and negotiation ongoing | Statement: [EAMU, legalFrameworkStatus, implementation and negotiation ongoing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalFrameworkStatus
Context triple: [EAMU, legalFrameworkStatus, implementation and negotiation ongoing]
  • A. legalCodeStatus
    Indicates the legal or regulatory status assigned to a specific code within a legal or statutory system (e.g., active, repealed, pending).
  • B. countryLegalFramework
    Indicates the legal system, regulations, and institutional rules that govern actions and relationships within a given country.
  • C. legalStandingBasis
    Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
  • D. legalAuthorityIn
    Indicates that an entity holds official legal power, jurisdiction, or governing authority within a specified area or domain.
  • E. legalStatusAffirmedIn
    Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46f5d1c8190bf830409e98464e5 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f031ad76848190b2c7a05d091b7faf completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be6299988190a34c98fa76d94700 completed April 21, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e6d054737081908aa7112975b77475 completed April 21, 2026, 1:18 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:51 p.m.