Triple

T21763293
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Max-3-SAT E537214 entity
Predicate hasAlternativeObjectiveFunction P116644 FINISHED
Object fraction of satisfied clauses LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fraction of satisfied clauses | Statement: [Max-3-SAT, hasAlternativeObjectiveFunction, fraction of satisfied clauses]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAlternativeObjectiveFunction
Context triple: [Max-3-SAT, hasAlternativeObjectiveFunction, fraction of satisfied clauses]
  • A. objectiveFunctionType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of objective function used to evaluate or optimize a system, model, or decision.
  • B. hasAlternativeReferent
    Indicates that an entity can also be referred to or identified by an alternative name, label, or reference.
  • C. hasEquivalentFormulation
    Indicates that two representations, statements, or formulations express the same underlying meaning, condition, or effect, even if they differ in form.
  • D. hasAlternativeMultiplierChoice
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more alternative options for a multiplier that can be chosen instead of a default value.
  • E. hasAlternativeHypothesis
    Indicates that an entity is associated with another entity that serves as a different or competing hypothesis to explain the same phenomenon or data.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46f5d1c8190bf830409e98464e5 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f031a711dc8190a786c9849dc344e8 completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6be6299988190a34c98fa76d94700 completed April 21, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:51 p.m.