Triple

T21751906
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gingembre Rouge E536934 entity
Predicate hasBaseNote P145232 FINISHED
Object woody notes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: woody notes | Statement: [Gingembre Rouge, hasBaseNote, woody notes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBaseNote
Context triple: [Gingembre Rouge, hasBaseNote, woody notes]
  • A. baseNote
    Indicates that one entity serves as the fundamental or reference note upon which another musical element (such as a chord, scale, or interval) is built or defined.
  • B. hasNotableBassline
    Indicates that something (typically a piece of music) features a bassline that is particularly prominent, distinctive, or otherwise noteworthy.
  • C. hasFrequencyNote
    Indicates that something is associated with a specific note describing how often it occurs or is repeated.
  • D. notableBase
    Indicates that a particular location serves as a significant or distinguished base or headquarters for an entity.
  • E. musicalBasisFor
    Indicates that one musical work, idea, or element serves as the foundational source or inspiration upon which another musical work, idea, or element is built or derived.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46eab808190b848242d63a17c47 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f01d8a6d4881908cc69e7247cce3a5 completed April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6969c16fc8190b5126c169317d85d completed April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e69f3ed4408190a4a78410bf660c44 completed April 20, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:50 p.m.