Triple

T21748222
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Missouri judiciary E536841 entity
Predicate administeredBy P86 FINISHED
Object Office of State Courts Administrator NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Office of State Courts Administrator | Statement: [Missouri judiciary, administeredBy, Office of State Courts Administrator]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Office of State Courts Administrator
Context triple: [Missouri judiciary, administeredBy, Office of State Courts Administrator]
  • A. Office of the State Courts Administrator
    The Office of the State Courts Administrator is the central administrative agency that supports and manages the operations, policy implementation, and resources of Florida’s statewide court system.
  • B. Office of the State Court Administrator
    The Office of the State Court Administrator is the central administrative agency that oversees operations, budgeting, and policy implementation for Oregon’s state court system.
  • C. State Court Administrative Office
    The State Court Administrative Office is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operation and management of Michigan’s state court system.
  • D. Office of Judicial Administration
    The Office of Judicial Administration is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operations, policy implementation, and court services of the Kansas judicial branch.
  • E. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that manages the operations, budgeting, and support services for New Hampshire’s state court system.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Office of State Courts Administrator
Target entity description: The Office of State Courts Administrator is the administrative agency that provides management, policy, and operational support to Missouri’s state court system.
  • A. Office of the State Courts Administrator
    The Office of the State Courts Administrator is the central administrative agency that supports and manages the operations, policy implementation, and resources of Florida’s statewide court system.
  • B. Office of the State Court Administrator
    The Office of the State Court Administrator is the central administrative agency that oversees operations, budgeting, and policy implementation for Oregon’s state court system.
  • C. State Court Administrative Office
    The State Court Administrative Office is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operation and management of Michigan’s state court system.
  • D. Office of Judicial Administration
    The Office of Judicial Administration is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operations, policy implementation, and court services of the Kansas judicial branch.
  • E. Administrative Office of the Courts
    The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that manages the operations, budgeting, and support services for New Hampshire’s state court system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46eab808190b848242d63a17c47 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f01a77e19c81909bf26f96aa41a7ce completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:50 p.m.