Triple
T21748222
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Missouri judiciary |
E536841
|
entity |
| Predicate | administeredBy |
P86
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Office of State Courts Administrator |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Office of State Courts Administrator | Statement: [Missouri judiciary, administeredBy, Office of State Courts Administrator]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Office of State Courts Administrator Context triple: [Missouri judiciary, administeredBy, Office of State Courts Administrator]
-
A.
Office of the State Courts Administrator
The Office of the State Courts Administrator is the central administrative agency that supports and manages the operations, policy implementation, and resources of Florida’s statewide court system.
-
B.
Office of the State Court Administrator
The Office of the State Court Administrator is the central administrative agency that oversees operations, budgeting, and policy implementation for Oregon’s state court system.
-
C.
State Court Administrative Office
The State Court Administrative Office is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operation and management of Michigan’s state court system.
-
D.
Office of Judicial Administration
The Office of Judicial Administration is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operations, policy implementation, and court services of the Kansas judicial branch.
-
E.
Administrative Office of the Courts
The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that manages the operations, budgeting, and support services for New Hampshire’s state court system.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Office of State Courts Administrator Target entity description: The Office of State Courts Administrator is the administrative agency that provides management, policy, and operational support to Missouri’s state court system.
-
A.
Office of the State Courts Administrator
The Office of the State Courts Administrator is the central administrative agency that supports and manages the operations, policy implementation, and resources of Florida’s statewide court system.
-
B.
Office of the State Court Administrator
The Office of the State Court Administrator is the central administrative agency that oversees operations, budgeting, and policy implementation for Oregon’s state court system.
-
C.
State Court Administrative Office
The State Court Administrative Office is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operation and management of Michigan’s state court system.
-
D.
Office of Judicial Administration
The Office of Judicial Administration is the central administrative agency that oversees and supports the operations, policy implementation, and court services of the Kansas judicial branch.
-
E.
Administrative Office of the Courts
The Administrative Office of the Courts is the central administrative agency that manages the operations, budgeting, and support services for New Hampshire’s state court system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46eab808190b848242d63a17c47 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f01a77e19c81909bf26f96aa41a7ce |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:50 p.m.