Triple
T21725310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coya of the Inca Empire |
E536259
|
entity |
| Predicate | rankInCourt |
P62203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | highest-ranking woman in the Inca Empire |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highest-ranking woman in the Inca Empire | Statement: [Coya of the Inca Empire, rankInCourt, highest-ranking woman in the Inca Empire]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rankInCourt Context triple: [Coya of the Inca Empire, rankInCourt, highest-ranking woman in the Inca Empire]
-
A.
courtRank
chosen
Indicates the formal hierarchical rank or status an individual holds within a court or courtly system.
-
B.
defendantRank
Indicates the hierarchical position or status assigned to a defendant relative to other defendants in a legal case.
-
C.
rankedBy
Indicates that one entity is ordered or assigned a position in a hierarchy or list according to criteria determined or applied by another entity.
-
D.
isRanked
Indicates that an entity has been assigned a position or level within an ordered hierarchy or comparative list.
-
E.
precedenceInCourt
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or action is considered to have higher authority or priority over another within a court’s decision-making process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46d3284819099a4f9d5a704eb95 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69efd972ed248190bd0d4ac43efccbfd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6969725bc81908e7ad19619ba2688 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:48 p.m.