Triple
T21720530
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article 124A of the Constitution of India |
E536142
|
entity |
| Predicate | struckDownInCase |
P25040
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India | Statement: [Article 124A of the Constitution of India, struckDownInCase, Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India Context triple: [Article 124A of the Constitution of India, struckDownInCase, Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India]
-
A.
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India is a landmark 2014 Supreme Court of India judgment that legally recognized transgender people as a third gender and affirmed their fundamental rights and entitlement to affirmative action.
-
B.
Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India
Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India was a Supreme Court of India decision that had upheld the constitutionality of the adultery offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code before it was later invalidated.
-
C.
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed judicial review as part of the Constitution’s basic structure and held that decisions of tribunals are subject to scrutiny by High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
-
D.
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015)
chosen
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India that reaffirmed judicial primacy in the appointment of judges by invalidating the National Judicial Appointments Commission and related constitutional amendments.
-
E.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and affirming constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46c6dd88190a595375fa6ebd701 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69efd96de818819084c268d4775a8e3a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:47 p.m.