Triple

T21713888
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kinyankole language E535971 entity
Predicate hasLexicalSimilarityWith P11829 FINISHED
Object Runyoro language NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Runyoro language | Statement: [Kinyankole language, hasLexicalSimilarityWith, Runyoro language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Runyoro language
Context triple: [Kinyankole language, hasLexicalSimilarityWith, Runyoro language]
  • A. Runyoro
    Runyoro is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Banyoro people in western Uganda.
  • B. Nyaturu language
    The Nyaturu language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Nyaturu people in central Tanzania.
  • C. Lusoga language
    The Lusoga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Basoga people in eastern Uganda.
  • D. Nyoro language chosen
    The Nyoro language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Banyoro people in western Uganda.
  • E. Nyunga language
    The Nyunga language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken by the Noongar people of southwestern Western Australia and is part of the broader Pama–Nyungan language family.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46c6dd88190a595375fa6ebd701 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69efb5369be88190bafc10863d4d1bd7 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:47 p.m.