Triple
T21692326
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bihor County |
E535400
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Crișul Repede |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crișul Repede | Statement: [Bihor County, hasRiver, Crișul Repede]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Crișul Repede Context triple: [Bihor County, hasRiver, Crișul Repede]
-
A.
Crișul Repede
chosen
Crișul Repede is a fast-flowing river in western Romania that runs through the Crișana region and is an important tributary of the Körös (Criș) river system.
-
B.
Crișul
Crișul is a river system in western Romania and eastern Hungary, known in Hungarian as Körös, that flows into the Tisza River.
-
C.
Crișul Alb
Crișul Alb is a river in western Romania that flows through the historical region of Crișana before joining the Körös (Criș) river system.
-
D.
Rucăr
Rucăr is a commune in Argeș County, Romania, known for its scenic Carpathian mountain landscapes and traditional rural character.
-
E.
Reșița
Reșița is an industrial city in western Romania, historically known as a major center of steel production and engineering in the Banat region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46a6ee481908836e1420fb78c9b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef96d0d4048190abfc3e3e06c51b8d |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:45 p.m.