Triple
T21673955
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GRRR! |
E534919
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesIconicHits |
P88822
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [GRRR!, includesIconicHits, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesIconicHits Context triple: [GRRR!, includesIconicHits, yes]
-
A.
includesIconicSongsBy
Indicates that one entity (such as an album, playlist, or collection) contains or features well-known, highly recognized songs created by another entity (typically an artist or band).
-
B.
hasIconicPlay
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particularly famous, defining, or emblematic play or performance.
-
C.
notableSongsIncluded
chosen
Indicates that certain notable or significant songs are included as part of the referenced entity (such as an album, playlist, or collection).
-
D.
hasIconicPerformanceBy
Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or production) features a particularly memorable or defining performance by a specific performer.
-
E.
includesHits
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses one or more hits, results, or matching items associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46898008190aa618a4af55bd1ee |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef8a0e06688190a75ea29534f5eed3 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6968abfdc81909cf9e0bd72db9eca |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:41 p.m.