Triple
T21667037
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rajah Kabunsuwan Manobo |
E534749
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Manobo language |
C45144
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Manobo language Context triple: [Rajah Kabunsuwan Manobo, instanceOf, Manobo language]
-
A.
Bikol language
The Bikol language is an Austronesian language (or group of closely related languages) spoken primarily in the Bicol Region of the Philippines, known for its distinct phonology and vocabulary while sharing many features with other Central Philippine languages.
-
B.
Minahasan language
The Minahasan language is an Austronesian language (or group of closely related dialects) traditionally spoken by the Minahasan people of North Sulawesi, Indonesia, characterized by complex verbal morphology and significant influence from Malay/Indonesian.
-
C.
Sama–Bajaw language
The Sama–Bajaw language is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken by the seafaring Sama-Bajau peoples across maritime Southeast Asia, particularly in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
-
D.
Misumalpan language
Misumalpan language is a small family of indigenous languages spoken primarily along the Atlantic coast of Nicaragua and neighboring regions, including Miskito, Sumo (Mayangna), and Matagalpan varieties.
-
E.
Sahaptian language
A Sahaptian language is a member of a small family of Native American languages spoken in the Plateau region of the northwestern United States, primarily in parts of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46898008190aa618a4af55bd1ee |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:37 p.m.