Triple
T21663685
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy |
E534655
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOfCritique |
P56725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | liberal parliamentarism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: liberal parliamentarism | Statement: [The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, subjectOfCritique, liberal parliamentarism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectOfCritique Context triple: [The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, subjectOfCritique, liberal parliamentarism]
-
A.
criticObjective
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the target or focus of a critic’s evaluation, commentary, or judgment.
-
B.
goalOfCritique
Indicates that a critique is directed toward achieving or serving a particular goal or purpose.
-
C.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
-
D.
critiquesAspect
Indicates that one entity evaluates and expresses critical judgment about a particular aspect or component of another entity.
-
E.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c467e1f48190af2650b19175abc4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef6c0a2a58819086db5b5c1c0f3371 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e696826c3c81909270791e79760937 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:36 p.m.