Triple
T21660600
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Southwestern Alabama |
E534583
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesCity |
P3207
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Foley, Alabama |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Foley, Alabama | Statement: [Southwestern Alabama, includesCity, Foley, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Foley, Alabama Context triple: [Southwestern Alabama, includesCity, Foley, Alabama]
-
A.
Foley, Alabama
chosen
Foley, Alabama is a growing Gulf Coast city in southern Alabama known for its tourism, shopping, and proximity to popular beaches.
-
B.
Fountain, Alabama
Fountain, Alabama is a small unincorporated community located in rural Monroe County in the southern part of the state.
-
C.
Fairfield, Alabama
Fairfield, Alabama is a small city in Jefferson County that functions as a residential and industrial suburb of Birmingham within central Alabama.
-
D.
Fulton, Alabama
Fulton, Alabama is a small incorporated town located in Clarke County in the southwestern part of the state.
-
E.
Fayetteville, Alabama
Fayetteville, Alabama is an unincorporated rural community located in Shelby County in the central part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c467e1f48190af2650b19175abc4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef6c07bcb88190a9864672c20325ff |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:36 p.m.