Triple

T21655894
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cypress County E534463 entity
Predicate borders P224 FINISHED
Object County of Newell NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: County of Newell | Statement: [Cypress County, borders, County of Newell]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: County of Newell
Context triple: [Cypress County, borders, County of Newell]
  • A. County of Newell chosen
    The County of Newell is a rural municipal district in southeastern Alberta, Canada, known for its agricultural economy and communities such as the city of Brooks.
  • B. Yancowinna County
    Yancowinna County is a cadastral division in far western New South Wales, Australia, that includes the city of Broken Hill and surrounding areas.
  • C. Audrain County
    Audrain County is a county in central Missouri known for its agricultural economy and its county seat, the city of Mexico.
  • D. Newell County
    Newell County is a municipal district in southeastern Alberta, Canada, known for its agricultural lands, oil and gas activity, and the city of Brooks within its boundaries.
  • E. Menindee County
    Menindee County is a cadastral division in far western New South Wales, Australia, used for land administration and property title purposes.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c467e1f48190af2650b19175abc4 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef59185b208190a2cf4b8f54a2c231 completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:36 p.m.