Triple

T21655010
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Anjediva Island E534437 entity
Predicate hasHistoricalStructureType P66217 FINISHED
Object fort LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fort | Statement: [Anjediva Island, hasHistoricalStructureType, fort]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricalStructureType
Context triple: [Anjediva Island, hasHistoricalStructureType, fort]
  • A. hasStructureHistory
    Indicates that there exists a record or account detailing the past states, changes, or development of a structure over time.
  • B. hasHistoricalRegionType
    Indicates that a historical region is associated with a specific type or classification of historical region.
  • C. hasHistoricalEntity
    Indicates a relationship where one entity includes, references, or is associated with another entity that existed or is defined in a past historical context.
  • D. hasTypeHistory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a record or sequence of its past and present types or classifications over time.
  • E. historicalType chosen
    Indicates that one entity classifies or characterizes another in terms of its role, status, or category within a historical context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c467e1f48190af2650b19175abc4 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef59176b28819092384fc5f8968022 completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e696826c3c81909270791e79760937 completed April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:36 p.m.