Triple
T21648526
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | First Persian Period of Egypt |
E534276
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableRulerAction |
P125567
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Darius I codification of Egyptian laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Darius I codification of Egyptian laws | Statement: [First Persian Period of Egypt, notableRulerAction, Darius I codification of Egyptian laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableRulerAction Context triple: [First Persian Period of Egypt, notableRulerAction, Darius I codification of Egyptian laws]
-
A.
hasFamousRuler
Indicates that an entity is or was ruled by a ruler who is widely recognized or historically notable.
-
B.
rulerOf
Indicates that one entity holds governing authority or sovereignty over another entity, such as a person ruling a country or territory.
-
C.
recognizedAsRulersBy
Indicates that certain entities are acknowledged or accepted by others as their legitimate rulers or authorities.
-
D.
emperorAction
chosen
Indicates actions performed by, initiated by, or under the direct authority of an emperor.
-
E.
notableMonarch
Indicates that the subject is a monarch who is distinguished or historically significant in some notable way.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c466aec88190ba39c7543dbc8ba2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef59131c88819082df8e5b87f5954b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e696826c3c81909270791e79760937 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:35 p.m.