Triple
T2163860
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | COL$ |
E46862
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedInFinancialDocuments |
P36097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [COL$, usedInFinancialDocuments, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInFinancialDocuments Context triple: [COL$, usedInFinancialDocuments, yes]
-
A.
usedInOfficialDocumentsOf
Indicates that something (e.g., a term, symbol, or format) is employed within the formal or legally recognized documents issued by a particular entity or jurisdiction.
-
B.
usedInTaxPayments
Indicates that something is employed or applied as part of making or fulfilling tax payments.
-
C.
usedByFinancialMarket
Indicates that something is employed or utilized within the operations, practices, or mechanisms of a financial market.
-
D.
usedDocument
Indicates that one entity has employed, referenced, or otherwise made use of a particular document in performing an action or fulfilling a purpose.
-
E.
usedLegalInstrument
Indicates that one party employed or relied upon a specific legal instrument (such as a contract, statute, or court order) in the context of an action or relationship with another party.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a184cbc8190877791f6552c2484 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbe8d105c819098371c35c88873dc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbd9c90408190b6b65498ca43ce26 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abbe1ecb7081909c2c66da08a48ab7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.