Triple

T21627439
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject AY-3-8912 E533738 entity
Predicate hasNoiseGenerator P145283 FINISHED
Object pseudo-random noise LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pseudo-random noise | Statement: [AY-3-8912, hasNoiseGenerator, pseudo-random noise]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoiseGenerator
Context triple: [AY-3-8912, hasNoiseGenerator, pseudo-random noise]
  • A. hasNoiseTerm
    Indicates that a given expression, model, or equation includes an additional noise term representing random or unexplained variation.
  • B. hasNoiseModes
    Indicates that an entity supports or is associated with one or more distinct noise-related operating modes or settings.
  • C. hasNoiseContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or occurs within a particular noise-related environment or acoustic condition.
  • D. hasRealWorldNoise
    Indicates that the subject includes or is affected by noise or variability originating from real-world conditions rather than idealized or simulated data.
  • E. hasNoisePerformance
    Indicates the degree to which one entity’s operation or behavior produces or is characterized by a certain level or quality of noise.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c464fba881908d0ff2ac80511ce1 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef52141e1c8190a861f4bc7cfcb490 completed April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e69677b9c48190bf81f795aa8ad74e completed April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e69cb4bcbc8190a4fc2d508df107be completed April 20, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:34 p.m.