Triple
T2162506
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chutney music |
E46831
|
entity |
| Predicate | fusionOf |
P14839
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Indian folk melodies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indian folk melodies | Statement: [Chutney music, fusionOf, Indian folk melodies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fusionOf Context triple: [Chutney music, fusionOf, Indian folk melodies]
-
A.
musicFusionOf
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one musical work, style, or element is created by combining or blending two or more distinct musical sources or genres.
-
B.
fuseType
Indicates the specific kind or category of fuse associated with or used in relation to an entity.
-
C.
mergedBy
Indicates that one entity is combined or integrated into another entity through the action or decision of a specific agent.
-
D.
mergedInto
Indicates that one entity has been combined with and absorbed into another entity, ceasing to exist as a separate unit.
-
E.
dominantFusionProcess
Indicates that one fusion process is the primary or prevailing mechanism compared to other possible fusion processes in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a184cbc8190877791f6552c2484 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbe8b9c0881908373eabc7f81c394 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbd9c90408190b6b65498ca43ce26 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.