Triple
T21620371
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Satyam |
E533558
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalDimension |
P11009
|
FINISHED |
| Object | correspondence to reality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: correspondence to reality | Statement: [Satyam, philosophicalDimension, correspondence to reality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalDimension Context triple: [Satyam, philosophicalDimension, correspondence to reality]
-
A.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
B.
philosophicalConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a philosophical concept that characterizes, explains, or is thematically central to the other entity.
-
C.
philosophicalOutlook
Indicates the general way an entity tends to think about, interpret, and evaluate fundamental questions about life, knowledge, and existence.
-
D.
philosophicalStatus
Indicates the philosophical position, stance, or classification attributed to an entity within a given conceptual or theoretical framework.
-
E.
philosophicalMethod
Indicates the method, approach, or technique used in conducting philosophical inquiry or reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c464fba881908d0ff2ac80511ce1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef3baeeae48190b78583b3bec8ee33 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e69665fe8c8190af7e38785db188b2 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:34 p.m.