Triple

T21613558
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gadebusch 1712 E533372 entity
Predicate hasSwedishCommanderRank P90400 FINISHED
Object Field Marshal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Field Marshal | Statement: [Gadebusch 1712, hasSwedishCommanderRank, Field Marshal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSwedishCommanderRank
Context triple: [Gadebusch 1712, hasSwedishCommanderRank, Field Marshal]
  • A. hasCommanderRank
    Indicates that an entity holds the military or organizational rank of commander within a specified hierarchy or context.
  • B. hasRankForCommandant
    Indicates that an entity holds the specific rank required to serve as a commandant.
  • C. rankOfNotableCommander chosen
    Indicates the military or organizational rank held by a notable commander associated with an entity.
  • D. combatantCommanderSweden
    Indicates that the referenced entity serves as a commander of Swedish combatant forces in a conflict or military context.
  • E. opposingCommanderRank
    Indicates that the related entity holds a specific military rank as the commander of the opposing or enemy force in a conflict or engagement.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46411108190bba0d4176dffc9f3 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef3ba8d7cc8190a59706896a4c073a completed April 27, 2026, 10:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e69665fe8c8190af7e38785db188b2 completed April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:33 p.m.