Triple
T21609976
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Frog |
E533276
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSecretIdentityForLeader |
P144774
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hidden mastermind |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hidden mastermind | Statement: [The Frog, hasSecretIdentityForLeader, hidden mastermind]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecretIdentityForLeader Context triple: [The Frog, hasSecretIdentityForLeader, hidden mastermind]
-
A.
hasHiddenIdentity
Indicates that an entity possesses a secret or concealed identity that is not known to others.
-
B.
hasLeader
Indicates that one entity serves as the leader or head of another entity.
-
C.
hasSecretIdentity
Indicates that an entity possesses an alternate, hidden identity that is not publicly known.
-
D.
hasSecretLevel
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular secrecy or security classification level.
-
E.
knowsSecretIdentityOf
Indicates that one entity is aware of the hidden or private true identity of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46411108190bba0d4176dffc9f3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef17e7d1388190922a90cb91ec9fc4 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e69665fe8c8190af7e38785db188b2 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e69b4aa2b48190830107391e81571a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:33 p.m.