Triple

T21605034
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HD 108248 E533148 entity
Predicate visualCompanionMagnitude P7282 FINISHED
Object 4.8 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4.8 | Statement: [HD 108248, visualCompanionMagnitude, 4.8]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: visualCompanionMagnitude
Context triple: [HD 108248, visualCompanionMagnitude, 4.8]
  • A. apparentMagnitudeV
    Indicates the visual brightness of an astronomical object as seen from Earth, measured in the V (visual) band of the electromagnetic spectrum.
  • B. apparentMagnitude chosen
    Indicates the observed brightness of an astronomical object as seen from Earth, on a logarithmic scale where lower values correspond to brighter appearances.
  • C. hasCompanionMagnitude
    Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity whose magnitude (such as size, intensity, or value) is being specified or characterized.
  • D. opticalCompanionMass
    Indicates the mass of a companion object as determined from optical observations or measurements.
  • E. visualCompanion
    Indicates that one entity serves as a visual counterpart, partner, or accompanying element to another in a visual context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46364608190a337dc8720dc2a35 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef17e4a8088190bf51ab2af2369762 completed April 27, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e69665fe8c8190af7e38785db188b2 completed April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:33 p.m.