Triple

T21603599
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vangunu language E533112 entity
Predicate isPartOf P10 FINISHED
Object New Georgia language continuum — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Georgia language continuum | Statement: [Vangunu language, isPartOf, New Georgia language continuum]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: New Georgia language continuum
Context triple: [Vangunu language, isPartOf, New Georgia language continuum]
  • A. Ijaw linguistic continuum
    The Ijaw linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Niger-Congo languages spoken primarily by the Ijaw people in the Niger Delta region of southern Nigeria.
  • B. Cora linguistic continuum
    The Cora linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Uto-Aztecan Cora dialects spoken in western Mexico that form a chain of mutually intelligible varieties rather than a single uniform language.
  • C. Mono language continuum
    The Mono language continuum is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Mono people of central California, encompassing varieties such as Western Mono.
  • D. Luri language continuum
    The Luri language continuum is a group of closely related Southwestern Iranian dialects spoken primarily by Lur and Bakhtiari communities in western and southwestern Iran.
  • E. Yabem-Takia language continuum
    The Yabem–Takia language continuum is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken in coastal and island areas of northern Papua New Guinea, forming a dialect chain rather than a single uniform language.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: New Georgia language continuum
Target entity description: The New Georgia language continuum is a group of closely related Oceanic languages spoken in the New Georgia Islands of the Solomon Islands, characterized by gradual dialectal variation across the region.
  • A. Ijaw linguistic continuum
    The Ijaw linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Niger-Congo languages spoken primarily by the Ijaw people in the Niger Delta region of southern Nigeria.
  • B. Cora linguistic continuum
    The Cora linguistic continuum is a group of closely related Uto-Aztecan Cora dialects spoken in western Mexico that form a chain of mutually intelligible varieties rather than a single uniform language.
  • C. Mono language continuum
    The Mono language continuum is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Mono people of central California, encompassing varieties such as Western Mono.
  • D. Luri language continuum
    The Luri language continuum is a group of closely related Southwestern Iranian dialects spoken primarily by Lur and Bakhtiari communities in western and southwestern Iran.
  • E. Yabem-Takia language continuum
    The Yabem–Takia language continuum is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken in coastal and island areas of northern Papua New Guinea, forming a dialect chain rather than a single uniform language.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46364608190a337dc8720dc2a35 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef17e3e18c8190b9e0626c7d16805b completed April 27, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:33 p.m.