Triple
T21597679
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Special Jury Prize (Karlovy Vary IFF) |
E532944
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJuryDecision |
P13938
|
FINISHED |
| Object | collective decision |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: collective decision | Statement: [Special Jury Prize (Karlovy Vary IFF), hasJuryDecision, collective decision]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasJuryDecision Context triple: [Special Jury Prize (Karlovy Vary IFF), hasJuryDecision, collective decision]
-
A.
hasJudge
Indicates that a legal case, proceeding, or decision is presided over or decided by a particular judge.
-
B.
hasJurors
Indicates that one entity serves as or includes jurors in relation to another entity, typically in the context of a legal case or proceeding.
-
C.
hasJudges
Indicates that one entity serves as a judge or panel of judges for another entity, such as an event, competition, or legal case.
-
D.
hasFinalDecisionOn
Indicates that one entity holds the ultimate authority or responsibility to make and enforce a conclusive decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
E.
hasJuryType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of jury.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46364608190a337dc8720dc2a35 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69eefae20c8881909c5354313d06183a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e632109d048190b4ac3f14fe48d1a0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:32 p.m.