Triple
T21584893
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miami Conservancy District |
E532621
|
entity |
| Predicate | operatesDam |
P133348
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Englewood Dam |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Englewood Dam | Statement: [Miami Conservancy District, operatesDam, Englewood Dam]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: operatesDam Context triple: [Miami Conservancy District, operatesDam, Englewood Dam]
-
A.
damOperator
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for operating, managing, or controlling the functioning of a dam associated with another entity.
-
B.
operatedCanal
Indicates that one entity managed and ran the functioning of a canal for another entity or in a given context.
-
C.
operationOf
Indicates that one entity is the function, activity, or process carried out by another entity (such as a system, device, or organization).
-
D.
hasDamProject
Indicates that an entity is associated with, involved in, or responsible for a specific dam construction or dam-related project.
-
E.
typeOfCanalOperated
Indicates that one entity operates or manages a canal of the specified type.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c4618bec8190bcb0feb74568cbb1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69eeeb5f2cc0819095552de70eb2ad8d |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e632109d048190b4ac3f14fe48d1a0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:31 p.m.