Triple
T2158489
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chorzów Factory case |
E47946
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalField |
P28364
|
FINISHED |
| Object | public international law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public international law | Statement: [Chorzów Factory case, hasLegalField, public international law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalField Context triple: [Chorzów Factory case, hasLegalField, public international law]
-
A.
hasLegalSubject
Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
-
B.
hasLegalRight
Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
-
C.
hasLegalFunction
Indicates that an entity performs, fulfills, or is assigned a specific legal role, duty, or function within a legal or regulatory context.
-
D.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
E.
hasJurisprudenceField
chosen
Indicates that an entity’s work, expertise, or classification pertains to a specific field or branch of jurisprudence (legal theory or law).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1d1fd8819088b34990d69a712f |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbe6a412c8190ae632282650739d9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbd9c90408190b6b65498ca43ce26 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.