Triple

T2157735
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gutenberg Bible copies E47929 entity
Predicate areHeldIn P36317 FINISHED
Object libraries LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: libraries | Statement: [Gutenberg Bible copies, areHeldIn, libraries]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areHeldIn
Context triple: [Gutenberg Bible copies, areHeldIn, libraries]
  • A. typicallyHeldIn
    Indicates that an event, activity, or process most commonly or usually takes place within a particular location, venue, or context.
  • B. heldAs
    Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
  • C. titleHeldIn
    Indicates that a particular title or position is held within a specified organization, jurisdiction, or contextual domain.
  • D. automaticallyHeld
    Indicates that the holding or possession relationship occurs by default or system rule, without requiring an explicit action or decision by the involved entities.
  • E. holdsIn
    Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a1d1fd8819088b34990d69a712f completed March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbe68fe0c8190beb5db003738a6e5 completed March 7, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbd9a60648190b20b116be5c7ad98 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abbe4252688190944491a450383450 completed March 7, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.