Triple
T21571337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neodermata |
E532289
|
entity |
| Predicate | ectoparasiticGroups |
P144299
|
FINISHED |
| Object | many Monogenea |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: many Monogenea | Statement: [Neodermata, ectoparasiticGroups, many Monogenea]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ectoparasiticGroups Context triple: [Neodermata, ectoparasiticGroups, many Monogenea]
-
A.
invertebrateFauna
Indicates that the subject has or is associated with a collection or community of animals lacking a vertebral column (invertebrates).
-
B.
cleptoparasiticGenera
Indicates a relationship where one genus exploits the food resources or nests gathered or prepared by another genus, typically by stealing them rather than obtaining them independently.
-
C.
insectOrderCommonName
Indicates the common (non-scientific) name of the insect order to which an insect belongs.
-
D.
taxonGroup
Indicates a classification relationship where one taxon is grouped within or associated with a broader taxonomic group.
-
E.
ApocritaIncludes
Indicates that the taxonomic group Apocrita (a suborder of Hymenoptera) includes or contains the referenced entities as its members or subgroups.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c460db088190828c64206a450273 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69eee9cd50188190b44eb25fb87312bb |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6320c8c2c81908bf031447d66a052 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e633bf34c481909925d8dc1a633a65 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:30 p.m.