Triple
T21550606
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carnot cycle |
E531749
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEfficiencyFormula |
P115662
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1 - Tc/Th |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1 - Tc/Th | Statement: [Carnot cycle, hasEfficiencyFormula, 1 - Tc/Th]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEfficiencyFormula Context triple: [Carnot cycle, hasEfficiencyFormula, 1 - Tc/Th]
-
A.
hasMaximumEfficiencyAt
Indicates that an entity reaches or exhibits its highest possible efficiency under a specified condition, context, or parameter value.
-
B.
maximumEfficiency
Indicates that an entity operates at its highest possible level of performance or productivity under given conditions.
-
C.
sampleEfficiency
Indicates how effectively a method or system learns or performs using a limited number of samples or data points.
-
D.
isMoreEfficientThan
Indicates that one entity performs a task or uses resources in a way that achieves the same or better outcome with less time, effort, or cost than another entity.
-
E.
thermalEfficiency
chosen
Indicates how effectively an energy conversion process transforms input energy into useful output work or heat, typically expressed as a ratio or percentage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c460232c81908de2c3819d17c00e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69eeb59258b88190966c18f1f519dad6 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6320766308190ba5dca2f7c826aa4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:28 p.m.