Triple
T21548194
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Snow Creek (California) |
E531685
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasName |
P744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Snow Creek |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Snow Creek | Statement: [Snow Creek (California), hasName, Snow Creek]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Snow Creek Context triple: [Snow Creek (California), hasName, Snow Creek]
-
A.
Snow Creek
Snow Creek is a small ski and snowboard resort known for its winter sports facilities and family-friendly atmosphere.
-
B.
Snow Creek
chosen
Snow Creek is a smaller tributary stream within the Whitewater River watershed, contributing to the region’s overall river system and hydrology.
-
C.
Drift Creek
Drift Creek is a river in Lincoln County, Oregon, known for flowing through coastal forest landscapes and supporting local recreation and wildlife habitats.
-
D.
Scott Creek
Scott Creek is a minor watercourse in New South Wales, Australia, that forms part of the Pages River catchment within the Hunter River basin.
-
E.
Opal Creek
Opal Creek is a scenic, crystal-clear stream in Oregon’s Cascade Range known for its old-growth forests, emerald pools, and role in regional wilderness conservation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45f17148190949c330ab9c27706 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69eeb590bb0881908cd849096696db10 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:28 p.m.