Triple

T21544074
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sabanagrande E531569 entity
Predicate sharesBorderWithDepartment P144171 FINISHED
Object departments of Honduras LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: departments of Honduras | Statement: [Sabanagrande, sharesBorderWithDepartment, departments of Honduras]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesBorderWithDepartment
Context triple: [Sabanagrande, sharesBorderWithDepartment, departments of Honduras]
  • A. sharesBorderWithInOfficeContext
    Indicates that two offices or workspaces are directly adjacent to each other, sharing a common boundary or wall within a workplace layout.
  • B. sharesDepartmentWith
    Indicates that two entities work in or are associated with the same department within an organization.
  • C. sharesBorderingNetworkWith
    Indicates that two entities are connected through adjacent or directly neighboring positions within the same network structure.
  • D. sharesDivisionWith
    Indicates that two entities belong to or operate within the same organizational division.
  • E. sharesCorridorWith
    Indicates that two entities are located along or connected by the same corridor or passageway.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c45f17148190949c330ab9c27706 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69eeb58d66ec8190b654a46932c841d3 completed April 27, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6320766308190ba5dca2f7c826aa4 completed April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e633bf34c481909925d8dc1a633a65 completed April 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:28 p.m.