Triple

T21540738
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ebba Brahe E531476 entity
Predicate spouse P13 FINISHED
Object Jacob De la Gardie NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jacob De la Gardie | Statement: [Ebba Brahe, spouse, Jacob De la Gardie]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jacob De la Gardie
Context triple: [Ebba Brahe, spouse, Jacob De la Gardie]
  • A. Jacob De la Gardie chosen
    Jacob De la Gardie was a prominent early 17th-century Swedish statesman and military commander who played a key role in Sweden’s expansion as a great power.
  • B. De la Gardie
    De la Gardie is a prominent Swedish noble family historically influential in the country’s political and cultural life.
  • C. Pontus Fredrik De la Gardie
    Pontus Fredrik De la Gardie was a Swedish nobleman and military officer from the influential De la Gardie family of the 17th century.
  • D. Magnus Stenbock
    Magnus Stenbock was a prominent Swedish field marshal and nobleman renowned for his military leadership during the Great Northern War.
  • E. Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie
    Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie was a powerful 17th-century Swedish statesman and nobleman who served as a leading political figure and patron of the arts during the Swedish Empire’s great power era.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c45f17148190949c330ab9c27706 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ee9d119e0c8190a207c0e8ae328a95 completed April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:28 p.m.