Triple

T21539115
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Reddingmuirhead E531431 entity
Predicate near P350 FINISHED
Object Redding NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Redding | Statement: [Reddingmuirhead, near, Redding]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Redding
Context triple: [Reddingmuirhead, near, Redding]
  • A. Redding
    Redding is a small city located in Ringgold County in the southern part of the U.S. state of Iowa.
  • B. Redding
    Redding is a mid-sized city in Northern California known as a regional hub for outdoor recreation, with access to Shasta Lake, the Sacramento River, and nearby national forests.
  • C. Redding
    Redding was the former name of Elizabeth City, a historic riverfront community in northeastern North Carolina.
  • D. Redding chosen
    Redding is a village in central Scotland, situated within the Falkirk council area and historically associated with coal mining.
  • E. Redding
    Redding is a surname most famously associated with legendary American soul singer Otis Redding and his musically inclined family.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c45f17148190949c330ab9c27706 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ee9d10a2888190bc4e502a829c76a4 completed April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:27 p.m.