Triple
T21495020
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tintic Mining District |
E530328
|
entity |
| Predicate | near |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eureka, Utah |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eureka, Utah | Statement: [Tintic Mining District, near, Eureka, Utah]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eureka, Utah Context triple: [Tintic Mining District, near, Eureka, Utah]
-
A.
Eureka, Utah
chosen
Eureka, Utah is a historic former mining town in central Utah known for its role in the Tintic Mining District and its well-preserved early 20th-century architecture.
-
B.
Yost, Utah
Yost, Utah is a small, unincorporated rural community in Box Elder County in the northwestern part of the U.S. state of Utah.
-
C.
Orem, Utah
Orem, Utah is a rapidly growing city along the Wasatch Front known for its family-friendly suburbs, proximity to Brigham Young University, and role as a commercial and educational hub in central Utah.
-
D.
Enoch, Utah
Enoch, Utah is a small city in southwestern Utah known for its residential communities and proximity to Cedar City in Iron County.
-
E.
Elwood, Utah
Elwood, Utah is a small rural town located in northern Utah within the Bear River Valley.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45bd15481909fba5910765cdda2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea575f2c81909cc0607c4b529f8d |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:23 p.m.