Triple
T21489116
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Newk |
E530188
|
entity |
| Predicate | bearerAssociatedStyle |
P140235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hard bop |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hard bop | Statement: [Newk, bearerAssociatedStyle, hard bop]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bearerAssociatedStyle Context triple: [Newk, bearerAssociatedStyle, hard bop]
-
A.
bearerStyleCharacteristic
chosen
Indicates that a bearer (such as a person or object) exhibits or is associated with a particular style-related characteristic.
-
B.
bindingStyle
Indicates the method or format by which two components, systems, or interfaces are connected or integrated for interaction.
-
C.
bearerAlignedWith
Indicates that the bearer’s position, orientation, or stance is arranged in line with, or matches, that of another specified reference.
-
D.
bearerAwardAssociation
Indicates a relationship in which an entity serves as the holder or recipient associated with a particular award.
-
E.
styleHeldBy
Indicates that a particular style, design, or aesthetic is possessed, used, or embodied by a specific entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45acc3881908e38d3f28964152b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea39e73081908e8d14118f9d1e03 |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e631f6e68081908f5ee4ce7413803e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:22 p.m.