Triple
T21485333
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | German federalism |
E530101
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalCourtRole |
P115711
|
FINISHED |
| Object | arbitrates federal-Länder disputes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: arbitrates federal-Länder disputes | Statement: [German federalism, constitutionalCourtRole, arbitrates federal-Länder disputes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalCourtRole Context triple: [German federalism, constitutionalCourtRole, arbitrates federal-Länder disputes]
-
A.
judicialRole
Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
-
B.
courtRole
Indicates the specific capacity or position an entity holds within a court proceeding or judicial context.
-
C.
courtFunction
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a judicial body or performs an official judicial role or function in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
roleAtCourt
Indicates the specific position, function, or status an entity holds within a court or courtly setting.
-
E.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45acc3881908e38d3f28964152b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea365a8481909635f614b23e751f |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e631ec1d048190b6da97da8222e413 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:21 p.m.